The Sims and Diffs of Contin vs. Sitch theories.

SIMULARITIES

-          In both theories, a successful leader has to utilize a relevant and effective style while analyzing the situation in which to use that style. I see it as kind of having an arsenal of styles and abilities, and a good leader knows when to use the right weapon, and at what time (situation) to use it.

-          There is variability in both models when it comes to making the right decisions. For the Contingency model, the variability lies in the amount of Leader-Member Relationships, Task Structure, Leader Position Power. Depending on how much or how little of the three is present in the situation will determine the right type of leadership style. For Situational Leadership Style the variability lies in deciding on which quadrant of the Hersey-Blanchard Model to choose to get a successful outcome.

DIFFERENCES

-          In Contingency Theory, the leader has to identify with him/her as to the style they are and then they address the situation at hand, and how to be successful. The situation is secondary. In Situational Leadership Theory, a successful leader will identify the situation and then evaluate the readiness of the team. The situation is the primary focus.  

-          Contingency Theory is self-assessment; how do you rate on the LPC scale and are you relationship or task oriented. Situational Leadership Theory is addressing the team and their ability and willingness, and then deciding the leadership style based on the evaluation.

-          In Contingency Theory, it seems as though a leader can only be relationship-oriented or task-oriented whereas, in Situational Leadership Theory, depending on the situation, the leader has to adjust the level of relationship/task used to achieve the desired outcome.